Kerala High Court: Power to Add Charges Remains With Court, Can’t be Done at Behest of Parties  ||  Allahabad High Court: Can’t Allow Petition for Expeditious Disposal of Cases on Regular Basis  ||  SC: Can’t Consider Payment of Compensation A Factor to Reduce Sentence of Convict  ||  SC: No Need for PMLA Acc. to Fulfill S. 45 Conditions When Furnis. Bond After Appearing Before Court  ||  Plea to Terminate 30 Weeks Pregnancy Dismissed, SC Talks About Right to Life of Child in Womb  ||  Supreme Court: Written Grounds of Arrest Must be Given to the Accused in UAPA Cases Too  ||  Supreme Court: Difference Between ‘Reasons of Arrest’ and ‘Grounds of Arrest’ Stated  ||  All HC: No Bar on Anticipa. Bail to Accused Booked u/s 376(3) IPC through UP Amend. to S. 438 CrPC  ||  NCDRC Cautioned by Supreme Court: Hierarchy of Judiciary Must Be Respected  ||  Supreme Court: Cannot Allow Wrong Doers to Make Profit Out of Their Own Wrongs    

Search Results for Tag : residential palace

News

SC: Erstwhile Rulers Need Not Pay Tax On Income From Leasing Palaces(13.12.2016)

Supreme Court has held that Erstwhile rulers are not required to pay tax on income earned by letting out a portion of their residential palace.

Tags : Supreme Court, Erstwhile rulers, residential palace, income tax



Supreme Court Rules, Income from Palace Rents Not Taxable Under IT Law(06.12.2016)

Supreme Court has held that income earned by erstwhile rulers of a princely state or their heirs by renting out a portion of residential palace was no.....

Tags : Supreme Court, erstwhile rulers, princely state, residential palace, Income Tax



Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved